<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JSE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Seismic Exploration</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>0963-0651</issn><eissn/><publisher><publisher-name>AccScience Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi"/><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Efficient 3D seismic acquisition design using compressive sensing principles</title><url>https://geophysical-press.com/journal/JSE/articles/21</url><author>ZHANGMENGLI</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>32</volume><issue>5</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2023-10-01</published-time></date></history><abstract>The ability to acquire 3D seismic data efficiently and cost-effectively is a major consideration in many applications. One way to achieve this goal is through the theory of compressive sensing. Compressive sensing uses sparse acquisition designs combined with the post-acquisition reconstruction to reduce the number of sensors. Sensor deployment or sampling pattern is a critical component in compressive sensing. Therefore, we analyze sampling patterns based on a Spectral Resolution Function (SRF) to improve the quality of acquired data. We have investigated two types of sparse seismic acquisition designs that use fewer receivers deployed irregularly, and also have compared three proposed reconstruction methods for each acquisition design. We predict the reconstruction accuracies of these six strategies, and then we verify our prediction using SEAM seismic dataset. SEAM seismic data examples demonstrate three major results: First, irregular line and irregular point patterns have different properties of SRF, and these properties can be applied to improve the accuracy of compressive sensing results. Second, a good combination of acquisition design and post-acquisition reconstruction selected based on the properties of SRF is able to obtain better reconstructed shot gathers and imaging results. Third, numerical simulations show that we can reconstruct single shot gather using only 25% of receivers and then produce seismic migration images comparable to those obtained from the full shot gathers. The overall results indicate that, the combination of a sparse acquisition design and corresponding compressive sensing reconstruction method could help facilitate a new generation of cost-effective seismic acquisitions.</abstract><keywords>acquisition design, compressive sensing, seismic acquisition, reconstruction, 3D</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Abma, R., Howe, D., Foster, M., Ahmed, I., Tanis, M., Zhang, Q., Arogunmati, A. and Alexander,  G.,  2015.  Independent  simultaneous  source  acquisition  and  processing. Geophysics, 80(6): WD37-WD44. Baraniuk, R. and Kelly, K., 2007. Compressive sensing. Signal Process., 4: 12-21.Brown, L., Mosher, C.C., Li, C., Olson, R., Doherty, J., Carey, T.C., Williams, L., Chang, J. and Staples, E., 2017. Application of compressive seismic imaging at lookout field, Alaska: The Leading Edge, 36: 670-676.Candès, E. and Romberg, J., 2005. l1-magic: Recovery of sparse signals via convex  programming: 1-19.Candès, E.J., Romberg, J. and Tao, T., 2006. Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information. IEEE Transact.  Informat. Theory, 52: 489-509.Candès, E.J. and Tao, T., 2006. Near-optimal signal recovery from random projections: Universal encoding strategies?: IEEE Transact. Informat. Theory, 52: 5406-5425.Candès, E.J. and Wakin, M.B.. 2008. An introduction to compressive sampling. IEEE  Signal Process. Magaz., 25: 21-30.Candès, M.W. and Boyd, S., 2008. Enhancing sparsity by reweighted l1 minimization. J Fourier Anal. Appl., 14: 877-905.Donoho,  D.L.,  2001.  Uncertainty principles  and  ideal  atomic  decomposition.  IEEE  Transact. Informat. Theory, 47: 2845-2862.Donoho, D.L., 2006. Compressed sensing. IEEE Transact. Informat. Theory, 52. 1289-Donoho,  D.L.  and  Tanner,  J.,  2010.  Exponential  bounds  implying  construction  of  compressed sensing matrices, error-correcting codes, and neighborly polytopes by  random sampling. IEEE Transact. Informat. Theory, 56: 2002-2016. Donoho, D.L. and Tsaig, Y ., 2008. Fast solution of`1-norm minimization problems when the solution may be sparse. IEEE Transact. Informat. Theory, 54: 4789-4812. Donoho, D.L., Tsaig, Y .,  Drori, I. and Starck, J., 2012. Sparse solution of underdeter-mined systems of linear equations by stagewise orthogonal matching pursuit:  IEEE Transact. Informat. Theory, 58: 1094-1121. Hansen, P.C., 1992. Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of the L-curve:  SIAM Review, 34: 561-580. doi: 10.1137/1034115.Herrmann, F.J., 2009. Compressive imaging by wavefield inversion with group sparsity. Expanded Abstr., 79th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Houston: 2337-2341.Herrmann,  F.J.,  Erlangga,  Y .A.  and  Lin,  T.T.,  2009.  Compressive  simultaneous  full-waveform simulation. Geophysics, 74(4): A35-A40.Janiszewski, F., Mosher, C., Li, C. and Malloy, J.,  2017. Applying compressive sensing  techniques in production o ffshore seismic surveys. Expanded Abstr., 87th Ann.  Internat. SEG Mtg., New Orleans: 47-51.Li, C., Mosher, C., Keys, R., Janiszewski, F. and Zhang, Y ., 2017. Improving streamer data sampling and resolution via nonuniform optimal design and reconstruction, Expanded Abstr., 87th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., New Orleans: 4241-4245. Li, Y . and Oldenburg, D.W., 2003. Fast inversion of large-scale magnetic data using  wavelet transforms and a logarithmic barrier method. Geophys. J. Internat., 152: 251-265.Lustig,  M.,  Donoho,  D.  and  Pauly,  J.M.,  2007.  Sparse  MRI:  The  application  of  compressed sensing for rapid MRI imaging: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine,  58, 1182-1195.Lustig, M., Donoho, D.L., Santos, J.M. and Pauly, J., 2008. Compressed sensing MRI. IEEE Signal Process. Magaz., 25: 72-82. Milton, A., Trickett, S. and Burroughs, L., 2011. Reducing acquisition costs with random sampling  and  multidimensional  interpolation.  Expanded  Abstr.,  81st  Ann.  Internat. SEG Mtg., San Antonio: 52-56. Moldoveanu,  N.,  2010.  Random  sampling:  A new  strategy  for  marine  acquisition.  Expanded Abstr.,  80th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Denver: 51-55.Moldoveanu,  N.,  Bilsby,  P.,  Quigley,  J.,  Kumar,  R.  and  Herrmann,  F.,  2018.  Compressive sensing based design for land and obs surveys: The noise issue.  Expanded Abstr.,  88th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Anaheim:  102–106. Mosher, C.C., Keskula, E., Kaplan, S.T., Keys, R.G., Li, C., Ata, E.Z.,  Morley, L.C., Brewer, J.D., Janiszewski, F.D., Eick, P.M. and Olson, R.A., 2012. Compressive seismic imaging. Expanded Abstr.,  82nd Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Las Vegas: 1-5. Mosher, C.C., Li, C., Janiszewski, F.D., Williams, L.S., Carey, T.C. and Ji, Y ., 2017.  Operational  deployment  of  compressive  sensing  systems  for  seismic  data  acquisition. The Leading Edge, 36: 661-669. Naghizadeh,  M.  and  Sacchi,  M.D.,  2010.  On  sampling  functions  and  Fourier  reconstruction methods. Geophysics, 75(Issue No.????), WB137-WB151. Nocedal, J. and Wright, S.J., 1999. Numerical Optimization. Springer-Verlag, New York. Oppert, S., Stefani, J., Eakin, D., Halpert, A., Herwanger, J.V ., Bottrill, A., Popov, P.,  Tan, L., Artus, V . and Oristaglio, M., 2017. Virtual time-lapse seismic monitoring using fully coupled flow and geomechanical simulations. The Leading Edge, 36;  750-768.Pawelec, I., Wakin, M. and Sava, P., 2021. Missing trace reconstruction for 2d land  seismic data with randomized sparse sampling. Geophysics, 86(6): P25-P36.Rudin, S. and Osher, C. and Fatami, E., 1992. Nonlinear total variation noise removal algorithm. Phys. D, 60: 259-268.Tsaig, Y . and Donoho, D.L., 2006. Extensions of compressed sensing. Signal Process.,  86: 549-571. (Sparse Approximations in Signal and Image Processing).Wakin,  M.,  Becker,  S., Nakamura,  E., Grant,  M., Sovero, E.,  Ching,  D.,   Yoo,  J.,  Romberg,  J.,  Emami-Neyestanak,  A.  and  Candès,  E.,  2012.  A nonuniform  sampler for wideband spectrally - sparse environments. IEEE J. Emerg. Select. Topics Circuits Syst., 2: 516-529.Wakin, M.B., Laska, J.N., Duarte, M.F., Baron, D., Sarvotham, S., Takhar, D., Kelly, K.F. and Baraniuk, R.G., 2006. An architecture for compressive imaging. Internat.  Conf. Image Process.: 1273-1276.Wason, H. and Herrmann, F.J., 2013. Time-jittered ocean bottom seismic acquisition.  Expanded Abstr.,  83rd Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Houston: 1-6. Wright, S., 1997, Primal-Dual Interior-Point Methods. SIAM, Philaelphia.Zhang, M., 2020. Marchenko Green’s functions from compressive sensing acquisition. Expanded Abstr.,  90th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Huston: 2794-2798. Zhang, M., 2021. Time-lapse seismic data reconstruction using compressive sensing:  Geophysics, 86(3): P37-P48.Zhang,  M.,  2022, Compressive sensing acquisition with application  to  Marchenko  imaging. Pure Appl. Geophys., 179: 2383-2404.Zhang, M. and Li, Y ., 2021. Efficient ground EM acquisition using irregular sparse  stations: A compressive sensing approach. Expanded Abstr., Internat. Mtg. Appl. Geosci. Energy: 1241-1245.Zhang, M. and  Li, Y ., 2022. Irregular acquisition design to maximize information: From cross-lines to ergodic sampling. Expanded Abstr., Internat. Mtg. Appl. Geosci.  Energy, Denver: 1150-1154. Zhang, M. and Lumley, D., 2019. Reconstruction of 3D seismic data from sparse random OBN acquisition by compressive sensing. Expanded Abstr., 89th Ann. Internat.  SEG Mtg., New Orleans: 127-130.Zwartjes, P. and Gisolf, A., 2007. Fourier reconstruction with sparse inversion. Geophys. Prosp., 55: 199-221.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
