<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JSE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Seismic Exploration</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>0963-0651</issn><eissn/><publisher><publisher-name>AccScience Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi"/><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Microseismic event detection based on multiscale detection convolutional neural network</title><url>https://geophysical-press.com/journal/JSE/articles/22</url><author>ZHANGYAN,LIUXIAO-QIU,SONGLI-WEI,DONGHONG-LI</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>32</volume><issue>5</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2023-10-01</published-time></date></history><abstract>Zhang, Y ., Liu, X.Q., Song, L.W. and Dong, H.L., 2023. Microseismic event detection based on multiscale detection convolutional neural network. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 32: 455-477. The traditional microseismic event detection method is mainly based on the characteristic calculation of microseismic signals. Its accuracy is greatly affected by the empirical parameter setting of the algorithm, characteristics selection of signal, and signal-to-noise ratio of microseismic signals. Furthermore, it also takes a long computation time when dealing with massive microseismic data. Therefore, this paper presents a method of microseismic event detection based on the multiscale neural network. Firstly, according to the characteristics of microseismic signals, one- dimensional convolutional neural network is built to extract the fine-grained features of the shallow layers and the semantic features of the deep layers. Then, the credibility factor model is established for the detection results of the different scale feature expressions, and the final recognition results are obtained by uncertainty reasoning. Compared with wavelet analysis, BP neural network, and traditional convolution neural network, the experimental results show that the proposed model is superior to other methods, and has better anti-noise and generalization ability. In addition, this method also provides a new strategy for processing other monitoring signals with large interference.</abstract><keywords>microseismic event detection, neural network, certainty factor, multiscale</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Boureau, Y .L, Bach, F., LeCun, Y . and  Ponce, J., 2010. Learning mid-level features for recognition. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern  Recognition, IEEE,: 2559-2566.Cai,  Z.,  Fan,  Q.,  Feris,  R.S.  and  Vasconcelos,  N., 2016.  A unified  multiscale  deep convolutional neural network for fast object detection. Proc. Europ. Conf. Comput.  Vis., Springer Internat. Publish.: 354-370.Dai, J., Li, Y ., He, K. and Sun, 2016. R-FCN: Object detection via region-based fully  convolutional  networks.  Proc.  30th  Ann  Conf.  Neur.  Inform.  Process.  Syst., Barcelona: 379-387.Kulesh,  M.,  Holschneider,  M.  and  Diallo,  M.S.,  2008.  Geophysical  wavelet  library: Applications of the continuous wavelet transform to the polarization and dispersion  analysis of signals. Comput. Geosci., 34: 1732-1752.Li,  Y .,  Yang,  T.H.  and  Liu,  H.L.,  2016. Real-time  microseismic  monitoring  and  its characteristic analysis in working face with high-intensity mining. J. Appl. Geophys.,  132: 152-163.Liu, W., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Szegedy, C., Reed, S., Fu, C.-Y . and Berg. A.C., 2016. SSD:  Single  shot  multibox  detector.  Europ.  Conf.  Comput.  Vision,  Springer International Publishing: 21-37.Liu, W, Rabinovich, A., Berg, A.C. and Parsenet, B., 2015. Looking wider to see better.  arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.04579.Maochen, G., 2005. Efficient mine microseismic monitoring. Internat. J. Coal Geol., 64,:  44-56.Maxwell,  S.C.,  Rutledge,  J.,  Jones,  R.  and  Fehler,  M.,  2010.  Petroleum  reservoir characterization using downhole microseismic monitoring. Geophysics, 75(5): A129-A137.Redmon, J. and Farhadi, A., 2017. YOLO9000: better, faster, stronger. Proc. IEEE Conf.  Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., Piscataway: 7263-7271.Redmon, J. and Farhadi, A., 2018. YOLOv3: An incremental improvement. Proc. IEEE  Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., Piscataway: 1-6.Shang, X., Li, X.,  Morales-Esteban, A. and Chen, G.H.,  2017. Improving  microseismic    event  and  quarry  blast  classification using  Artificial  Neural  Networks  based  on    Principal Component Analysis. Earthq. Engineer.,  99: 42-149.Sheng, G.Q., Tang, X.G., Xie, K. and Jie, X.,  2019. Hydraulic fracturing microseismic  first arrival picking method based on non-subsampled shearlet transform and higher-order-statistics. J. Seismic Explor., 28: 593-618. Shi-Chao,  L.V .,  Song,  W.Q.,  Liu,  Y .M.,  Guo,  X.Z.  and  Zhang,  H.F., 2013.  The polarization constrained LTA/STA method for automatic detection of microseismic.  Geophys. Geochem. Explor., 37: 488-493.Singh, B., Najibi , M., Davis , L.S., 2018. SNIPER: Efficient multiscale training. Proc.  32nd Conf. Neural Informat. Process. Syst., Montreal: 9310-9320.Sleeman,  R.  and  Eck,  T.V .,  1999.  Robust  automatic  P-phase  picking:  an  on-line implementation in the analysis of broadBand seismogram recordings. Phys. Earth  Planet. Inter., 113: 265-275.Sun,  J.,  Wang,  L.  and  Hou,  H.,  2012.  Application  of  micro-seismic  monitoring technology in mining engineering. Internat. J. Mining Sci. Technol., 22: 79-83.Tan, Y . and Nava, F.A., 1988. Automatic seismic wave detection and autoregressive  model method. Mathemat. Geol., 20: 37-48.Velis, D., Sabbione, J.I. and Sacchi, M.D., 2015. Fast and automatic microseismic phase-arrival detection and denoising by pattern recognition and reduced-rank filtering.  Geophysics, 80(6): WC25-WC38.Xie, J., Yang, C., Gupta, N., King, M.J. and Datta-Gupta, A., 2015. Integration of shale  gas production data and micro-seismic for fracture and reservoir properties using fast  marching method. SPE Journal, 20: 347-359.Xu, S., Zhang, C.R., Chen, Z.Y ., Li, Y .H. and Liu, J.P., 2021. Accurate identification of  microseismic  waveforms  based  on  an  improved  neural  network  model.  J.  Appl. Geophys., 190: 926-951.Li, Y ., Yang, T.H., Liu, H.L., Wang, H., Hou, X.-G., Zhang, P.-H. and Wang, P.-T., 2016. Real-time microseismic monitoring and its characteristic analysis in working face  with high-intensity mining. J. Appl. Geophys., 132: 152-163.Zhang, H., 2003. Automatic P-wave arrival detection and picking with multiscale wavelet analysis for single-component recordings. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 93: 1904-1912.Zhang, Y ., Chan, W. and Jaitly, N., 2017. Very deep convolutional networks for end-toend speech  recognition.  IEEE Internat.  Conf. Acoust., Speech Signal Process.:  4845-4849.Zhao, H., Shi, J., Qi, X.,  Wang, X. and Jia, J. , 2017. Pyramid scene parsing network.  IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., Piscataway: 2881-2890.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
