<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JSE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Seismic Exploration</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>0963-0651</issn><eissn/><publisher><publisher-name>AccScience Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi"/><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>A fourth-order Runge-Kutta method with eighth-order accuracy and low numerical dispersion for solving the seismic wave equation</title><url>https://geophysical-press.com/journal/JSE/articles/242</url><author>ZHANGCHAOYUAN,CHENLI</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2016-06-01</published-time></date></history><abstract>Zhang, C. and Chen, L., 2016. A fourth-order Runge-Kutta method with eighth-order accuracy and low numerical dispersion for solving the seismic wave equation. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 25: 229-255. In this paper, we give a fourth-order Runge-Kutta method with the eighth-order accuracy and low numerical dispersion for solving the seismic wave equation, which is called the ENAD-FRK method in brief. We first give the theoretical deduction and stability conditions for this new method in detail. And, we derive numerical dispersion relations of the ENAD-FRK method in 2D acoustic case and compare numerical dispersions against the eighth-order Lax-Wendroff correction (LWC) scheme and the eighth-order Staggered-grid (SG) finite difference method. Meanwhile, we compare the memory requirement and the computational efficiency of the proposed method against the eighth-order LWC scheme for modeling 2D seismic wave fields in a two-layer heterogeneous acoustic medium. Last, we apply the ENAD-FRK method to simulate 2D seismic wave propagating in a three-layer homogenous transversely isotropic elastic medium, a two-layer homogenous isotropic elastic medium and a Marmousi model. Simulation results indicate that the ENAD-FRK method can greatly save both computational costs and storage space as contrasted to the eighth-order LWC scheme. Meanwhile, Both comparisons of numerical dispersion analysis and numerical experimental results show that the ENAD-FRK method can effectively suppress numerical dispersion caused by discretizing the seismic wave equation when too coarse grids are used against the eighth-order LWC scheme and the eighth-order SG method.</abstract><keywords>Runge-Kutta method, NAD operator, seismic wave equation, numerical dispersion, wave simulation</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Blanch, J.O. and Robertsson, A., 1997. A modified Lax-Wendroff correction for wave propagationin media described by Zener elements. Geophys. J. Internat., 131: 381-386.Chen, S., Yang, D.H and Deng, X.Y., 2010. An improved algorithm of the fourth-orderRunge-Kutta method and seismic wave-field simulation. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese),3: 1196-1206.Dablain, M.A., 1986. The application of high-order differencing to scalar wave equation.Geophysics, 51: 54-66.Dong, L.G., Ma, Z.T., Cao, J.Z., Wang, H.Z., Gong, J.H., Lei, B. and Xu, S.Y., 2000. Astaggered-grid high-order difference method of one-order elastic wave equation. Chinese J.Geophys. (in Chinese), 43: 411-419.Kelly, K.R., Wave, R.W. and Treitel, S., 1976. Synthetic seismograms: a finite-differenceapproach. Geophysics, 41: 2-27.Lax, P.D, and Wendroff, B., 1964. Difference schemes for hyperbolic equations with high orderof accuracy. Commun. Pure Appl. Mathem., 17: 381-398.Moczo, P., Kristek, J. and Halada, L., 2000. 3D 4th-order staggered-grid finite-difference schemes:stability and grid dispersion. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 90: 587-603.Moczo, P., Kristek, J., Vavrycuk, V., Archuleta, R.J. and Halada, L., 2002. 3D heterogeneousstaggered-grid finite-difference modeling of seismic motion with volume harmonic andarithmetic averaging of elastic moduli and densities. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 92:3042-3066.Saenger, E.H., Gold, N. and Shapiro, $.A., 2000. Modeling the propagation of elastic waves usinga modified finite-difference grid. Wave Motion, 31: 77-92.Tong, P., Yang, D.H., Hua, B.L. and Wang, M.X., 2013. A high-order stereo-modeling methodfor solving wave equations. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 103: 811-833.Vichnevetsky, R., 1979. Stability charts in the numerical approximation of partial differentialequations. a review. Mathemat. Comput. Simul., 21: 170-177.Virieux, J., 1986. P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous median: Velocity-stress finite-differencemethod. Geophysics, 51: 889-901.Wang, L., Yang, D.H. and Deng, X.Y., 2009. A WNAD method for seismic stress-field modelingin heterogeneous media. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 52: 1526-1535.Yang, D.H., Chen, S. and Li, J.Z., 2007a. A Runge-Kutta method using high-order interpolationapproximation for solving 2D acoustic and elastic wave equations. J. Seismic Explor., 16:331-353.Yang, D.H., Liu, E., Zhang, Z.J. and Teng, J.W., 2002. Finite-difference modeling intwo-dimensional anisotropic media using a flux-corrected transport technique. Geophys. J.Internat., 148: 320-328.Yang, D.H., Peng, J.M., Lu, M. and Terlaky, T., 2006. Optimal nearly-analytic discreteapproximation to the scalar wave equation. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96: 1114-1130.Yang, D.H., Song, G.J., Chen, S. and Hou, B.Y., 2007b. An improved nearly analytical discretemethod: an efficient tool to simulate the seismic response of 2-D porous structures. J.Geophys. Engin., 4: 40-52.Yang, D.H., Teng, J.W., Zhang, Z.J. and Liu, E., 2003. A nearly-analytic discrete method foracoustic and elastic wave equations in anisotropic media. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 93:882-890.Yang, D.H., Tong, P. and Deng, X.Y., 2012. A central difference method with low numericaldispersion for solving the scalar wave equation. Geophys. Prosp., 60: 885-905.Yang, D.H., Wang, N., Chen, S. and Song, G.J., 2009. An explicit method based on the implicitRunge-Kutta algorithm for solving the wave equations. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 99:3340-3354.Zeng, Y.Q. and Liu, Q.H., 2001. A staggered-grid finite-difference method with perfectly matchedlayers for poroelastic wave equations. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 109: 571-2580.248 ZHANG &amp; CHENZhang, C.Y., Li, X., Ma, X. and Song, G.J., 2014a. A Runge-Kutta method with usingeighth-order nearly-analytic spatial discretization operator for solving a 2D acoustic waveequation. J. Seismic Explor., 23: 279-302.Zhang, C.Y., Ma, X., Yang, L. and Song, G.J., 2014b. Symplectic partitioned Runge-Kutta methodbased on the eighth-order nearly analytic discrete operator and its wavefield simulations.Appl. Geophys., 11: 89-106.Zhang, Z.J., Wang, G.J. and Harris, J.M., 1999. Multi-component wave-field simulation in viscousextensively dilatancy anisotropic media. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 114: 25-38.Zheng, H.S,, Zhang, Z.J. and Liu, E., 2006. Non-linear seismic wave propagation in anisotropicmedia using the flux-corrected transport technique. Geophys. J. Internat., 65: 943-956.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
